Inspector Of Police Kangeyam Ps vs Thangaraj Advocate - Vadivelsamy P — 103/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 05th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTI150003212024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

19-03-2024

Filing Number

321/2024

Filing Date

02-04-2024

Registration No

103/2024

Registration Date

02-04-2024

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Kangeyam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

05th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A)
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 3,181(4),199A
Mp/1/2026 Classification : Advance Petition Section Inspector Of Police Kangeyam Ps
Mp/2/2026 Classification : Advance Petition Section Inspector Of Police Kangeyam Ps
Mp/3/2026 Classification : Advance Petition Section Inspector Of Police Kangeyam Ps

Petitioner(s)

Inspector Of Police Kangeyam Ps (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

Thangaraj Advocate - Vadivelsamy P

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate

05-03-2026

Disposed

24-02-2026

Judgement

17-02-2026

Questioning

10-02-2026

Evidence

06-02-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

05-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Court Decision Summary The court acquitted the accused, Sangaraj, in a fatal traffic case under Section 199(A) of the Motor Vehicles Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was responsible for the death of Raghavendra through rash or negligent driving. The court noted significant gaps and contradictions in witness testimonies, particularly that eyewitnesses could not clearly identify the vehicle's driver or provide coherent accounts of the accident circumstances, rendering the government's case insufficient to prove guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court acquitted the accused, Sangaraj, in a fatal traffic case under Section 199(A) of the Motor Vehicles Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was responsible for the death of Raghavendra through rash or negligent driving. The court noted significant gaps and contradictions in witness testimonies, particularly that eyewitnesses could not clearly identify the vehicle's driver or provide coherent accounts of the accident circumstances, rendering the government's case insufficient to prove guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Kangeyam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case