Inspector Of Police Kangeyam Ps vs Thangaraj Advocate - Vadivelsamy P — 103/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 05th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTI150003212024
e-Filing Number
19-03-2024
Filing Number
321/2024
Filing Date
02-04-2024
Registration No
103/2024
Registration Date
02-04-2024
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Kangeyam
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
05th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector Of Police Kangeyam Ps (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
Thangaraj Advocate - Vadivelsamy P
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 17-02-2026 | Questioning |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted the accused, Sangaraj, in a fatal traffic case under Section 199(A) of the Motor Vehicles Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was responsible for the death of Raghavendra through rash or negligent driving. The court noted significant gaps and contradictions in witness testimonies, particularly that eyewitnesses could not clearly identify the vehicle's driver or provide coherent accounts of the accident circumstances, rendering the government's case insufficient to prove guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted the accused, Sangaraj, in a fatal traffic case under Section 199(A) of the Motor Vehicles Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was responsible for the death of Raghavendra through rash or negligent driving. The court noted significant gaps and contradictions in witness testimonies, particularly that eyewitnesses could not clearly identify the vehicle's driver or provide coherent accounts of the accident circumstances, rendering the government's case insufficient to prove guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts