K.Saravanaguhan vs Duraisamy Advocate - Mohankumar K C — 39/2018

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNTI150000822018

Evidence

Next Hearing

06th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

39/2018

Filing Date

21-05-2018

Registration No

39/2018

Registration Date

07-06-2018

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Kangeyam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138
Filing Number : Section CRLMP/19/2023

Petitioner(s)

K.Saravanaguhan

Adv. Prabhakaran R S

Respondent(s)

Duraisamy Advocate - Mohankumar K C

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate

15-04-2026

Evidence

01-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

18-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

09-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

04-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

24-09-2025
Copy of Deposition / Witness

This document is a Deposition of Witness (Judicial Form No. 53) from the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Kangayam, dated 24.09.2025, in case S.T.C. No. 39 of 2018. The witness (D.W. 1) deposed regarding a dispute over a case document allegedly containing forged signatures and claims of malicious prosecution. The witness's testimony was recorded in open court, transcribed, read back to the witness, and the witness affixed their signature/thumbmark. Note: This is a witness deposition record, not a case judgment or order granting/denying relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a Deposition of Witness (Judicial Form No. 53) from the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Kangayam, dated 24.09.2025, in case S.T.C. No. 39 of 2018. The witness (D.W. 1) deposed regarding a dispute over a case document allegedly containing forged signatures and claims of malicious prosecution. The witness's testimony was recorded in open court, transcribed, read back to the witness, and the witness affixed their signature/thumbmark. Note: This is a witness deposition record, not a case judgment or order granting/denying relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Kangeyam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case