M.Chinnasamy and three vs K P Kumarasamy and one Advocate - P.Vadivelsamy — 205/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section sec27(c). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI140002362022
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
256/2022
Filing Date
17-09-2022
Registration No
205/2022
Registration Date
17-09-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Kangeyam
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.Chinnasamy and three
Adv. P.Thangamani
K.Saminathan
Adv. P.Thangamani
P.Saminathan
Adv. P.Thangamani
D.Balasubramani
Adv. P.Thangamani
Respondent(s)
K P Kumarasamy and one Advocate - P.Vadivelsamy
K.Arunkumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Arguments
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 15-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 10-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 08-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 06-04-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No. O.S. 205/2022, District Civil Court, Kangayam Date: April 17, 2026 This is a property dispute case involving land parcels (Plot Nos. 886 and 887) in Tiruppur district. The court recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of a witness (Thangraj) who testified regarding boundary disputes and alleged interference with the plaintiffs' right of way. The witness testimony addressed conflicting accounts about land ownership, boundary demarcation, and whether the defendant unlawfully obstructed the plaintiffs' access to their property through fencing and physical obstacles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No. O.S. 205/2022, District Civil Court, Kangayam Date: April 17, 2026 This is a property dispute case involving land parcels (Plot Nos. 886 and 887) in Tiruppur district. The court recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of a witness (Thangraj) who testified regarding boundary disputes and alleged interference with the plaintiffs' right of way. The witness testimony addressed conflicting accounts about land ownership, boundary demarcation, and whether the defendant unlawfully obstructed the plaintiffs' access to their property through fencing and physical obstacles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts