Kalaiyarasi and two vs The District Collector and three Advocate - V.Murugesan — 171/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section sec25(d),sec27(c). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI140002012022
Next Hearing
13th March 2026
Filing Number
216/2022
Filing Date
27-07-2022
Registration No
171/2022
Registration Date
01-08-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Kangeyam
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kalaiyarasi and two
Adv. R.Nirmal kumar
Dinesh boopathy
Adv. R.Nirmalkumar
Dilipraj
Adv. R.Nirmalkumar
Respondent(s)
The District Collector and three Advocate - V.Murugesan
The Thasildhar, Kangayam
Adv. V.Murugesan
Saraswathi
Adv. R.S.Prabhakaran
Jagadeesh
Adv. R.S.Prabhakaran
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Part Heard
Part Heard
Trial
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 24-02-2026 | Part Heard |
| 16-02-2026 | Trial |
| 11-02-2026 | Trial |
| 05-02-2026 | Trial |
Interim Orders
This is a District Civil Court order from Kangayam, Tamil Nadu (Original Case No. 171/2022) dated March 5, 2026. The court recorded the plaintiff's (Kalaiyarasi) testimony in a succession/heirship certificate case. The plaintiff claims to be the first wife of the deceased Palanisamy and seeks a heirship certificate for herself and her two sons. However, during cross-examination, the plaintiff's testimony revealed significant inconsistencies—she failed to produce supporting documents (marriage certificate, registration proof, children's birth certificates showing the deceased's name, or property evidence), admitted to living separately at her parents' home for 25 years, and could not substantiate her marital relationship. The court found the plaintiff's claims lack documentary support and credibility. The case status remains pending with the court noting procedural deficiencies in the plaintiff's presentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a District Civil Court order from Kangayam, Tamil Nadu (Original Case No. 171/2022) dated March 5, 2026. The court recorded the plaintiff's (Kalaiyarasi) testimony in a succession/heirship certificate case. The plaintiff claims to be the first wife of the deceased Palanisamy and seeks a heirship certificate for herself and her two sons. However, during cross-examination, the plaintiff's testimony revealed significant inconsistencies—she failed to produce supporting documents (marriage certificate, registration proof, children's birth certificates showing the deceased's name, or property evidence), admitted to living separately at her parents' home for 25 years, and could not substantiate her marital relationship. The court found the plaintiff's claims lack documentary support and credibility. The case status remains pending with the court noting procedural deficiencies in the plaintiff's presentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts