P. Balusamy vs N. Subbaraya gounder and 3 others Advocate - Anguraj S — 162/2016
Case under Suitsvaluationact Section 27(c). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI140001972016
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Date
21-07-2016
Registration No
162/2016
Registration Date
21-07-2016
Court
District Munsif Court, Kangeyam
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P. Balusamy
Adv. Balusamy K
Rukkumani
Adv. Balusamy K
Yuvaraj
Adv. Balusamy K
Dhamothiran
Adv. Balusamy K
Respondent(s)
N. Subbaraya gounder and 3 others Advocate - Anguraj S
S. Thangaraj
Adv. Anguraj S
Pushpathal
Adv. Anguraj S
T. Jayakumar
Adv. Anguraj S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 16-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 10-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 07-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 01-04-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This is a civil property dispute case (Original Case 162/2016) from the District Civil Court, Kangayam, heard on April 10, 2026. The court recorded the cross-examination testimony of the plaintiff Rukmani regarding a land dispute involving a "thava" (water channel) and adjoining agricultural properties. The court examined witness statements about land boundaries, ownership rights, irrigation channels, and alleged unauthorized fencing by defendants. The case involves multiple defendants and questions about proper party inclusion and jurisdiction. The order documents the witness examination process but does not appear to contain a final judgment or specific relief granted/denied; rather, it records the procedural examination of evidence during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a civil property dispute case (Original Case 162/2016) from the District Civil Court, Kangayam, heard on April 10, 2026. The court recorded the cross-examination testimony of the plaintiff Rukmani regarding a land dispute involving a "thava" (water channel) and adjoining agricultural properties. The court examined witness statements about land boundaries, ownership rights, irrigation channels, and alleged unauthorized fencing by defendants. The case involves multiple defendants and questions about proper party inclusion and jurisdiction. The order documents the witness examination process but does not appear to contain a final judgment or specific relief granted/denied; rather, it records the procedural examination of evidence during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts