D.Thangaraj vs Jothimani Advocate - R.P.Palanikumar — 147/2020

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section sec.31,sec.27(c). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 16th March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI140001842020

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

16th March 2026

Filing Number

197/2020

Filing Date

04-08-2020

Registration No

147/2020

Registration Date

07-08-2020

Court

District Munsif Court, Kangeyam

Judge

1-District Munsif

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section sec.31,sec.27(c)

Petitioner(s)

D.Thangaraj

Adv. Iswaramoorthy C

Respondent(s)

Jothimani Advocate - R.P.Palanikumar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif

05-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

25-02-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

17-02-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

16-02-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

12-02-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

11-11-2025
Copy of Deposition / Witness

Case Summary This is a civil suit (Original Case No. 147/2020) from the District Court of Kangayam heard on November 11, 2025. The court recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of the plaintiff's witness, Ramasamy, regarding a property dispute involving agricultural land ("Thava Saathu"). The witness testified about his knowledge of the property, irrigation details, and his involvement with the land, while under cross-examination, he admitted several inconsistencies and gaps in his knowledge regarding the property's acquisition and boundaries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary This is a civil suit (Original Case No. 147/2020) from the District Court of Kangayam heard on November 11, 2025. The court recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of the plaintiff's witness, Ramasamy, regarding a property dispute involving agricultural land ("Thava Saathu"). The witness testified about his knowledge of the property, irrigation details, and his involvement with the land, while under cross-examination, he admitted several inconsistencies and gaps in his knowledge regarding the property's acquisition and boundaries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Kangeyam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case