Nandhakumar vs Murugesan — 101/2023

Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 33. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 23-Apr-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI140001112023

Filing Number

117/2023

Filing Date

25-Apr-2023

Registration No

101/2023

Registration Date

25-Apr-2023

Court

District Munsif Court, Kangeyam

Judge

1-District Munsif

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Suits Valuation Act Section 33

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nandhakumar

    Adv. C.Iswaramoorthy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Murugesan

  2. 2.Renuka

Case History

  1. 23-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  7. 07-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  8. 03-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  10. 06-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  11. 17-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  12. 08-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  13. 24-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  14. 19-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  15. 17-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  16. 25-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  17. 26-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  18. 19-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  19. 22-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  20. 23-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  21. 27-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  22. 17-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  23. 17-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  24. 07-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  25. 13-Feb-2025

    Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF

    Summary: In Original Case No. 101/2023 before the District Civil Court, Kangayam (dated February 13, 2025), the witness Senthilkumar's examination-in-chief testimony was recorded and verified. The court accepted the witness's sworn statement, confirming that the facts stated are true and the signature is genuine. The case has been adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  26. 13-Feb-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  27. 09-Jan-2025

    Publication

    District Munsif

  28. 10-Dec-2024

    Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF

  29. 10-Dec-2024

    Publication

    District Munsif

  30. 20-Nov-2024

    Publication

    District Munsif

  31. 20-Sep-2024

    Publication

    District Munsif

  32. 10-Aug-2024

    Publication

    District Munsif

  33. 03-Aug-2024

    Steps

    District Munsif

  34. 03-Jul-2024

    Steps

    District Munsif

  35. 03-Jun-2024

    Steps

    District Munsif

  36. 29-Apr-2024

    Steps

    District Munsif

  37. 27-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  38. 14-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  39. 11-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  40. 22-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  41. 13-Dec-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  42. 16-Oct-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  43. 09-Aug-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  44. 12-Jul-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  45. 22-Jun-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  46. 25-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  47. 25-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 101/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Original Case No. 101/2023 before the District Civil Court, Kangayam (dated February 13, 2025), the witness Senthilkumar's examination-in-chief testimony was recorded and verified. The court accepted the witness's sworn statement, confirming that the facts stated are true and the signature is genuine. The case has been adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case