Jegatheeskumar vs K.Sivachalam Advocate - Iswaramoorthy C — 76/2023

Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 25(d),27(c). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

Part Heard Next hearing 04-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI140000762023

Filing Number

81/2023

Filing Date

23-Mar-2023

Registration No

76/2023

Registration Date

24-Mar-2023

Court

District Munsif Court, Kangeyam

Judge

1-District Munsif

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Suits Valuation Act Section 25(d),27(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jegatheeskumar

    Adv. Venkatasubbu R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.K.Sivachalam Advocate - Iswaramoorthy C

  2. 2.S.Banumathi

    Adv. Iswaramoorthy C

Case History

  1. 04-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  3. 05-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  4. 09-Jan-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif

  5. 15-Dec-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif

  6. 24-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  7. 17-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  8. 11-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  9. 03-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  10. 27-Oct-2025

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The District Munsiff Court, Kangayam allowed the application filed by the petitioners/defendants to accept an additional counter-claim in the original suit. The court granted the petition on the grounds that the additional counter-claim was necessary to substantiate the defendants' case and that they had not deliberately delayed filing it, conditioned upon payment of ₹1,000 costs to the opposite party by November 3, 2025, and both parties cooperating to expedite the main case proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 27-Oct-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  12. 16-Oct-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  13. 24-Sep-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  14. 02-Sep-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  15. 12-Aug-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  16. 02-Aug-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  17. 31-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  18. 24-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  19. 18-Jul-2025

    Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF

  20. 18-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  21. 02-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  22. 13-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  23. 29-Apr-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  24. 24-Mar-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  25. 14-Mar-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  26. 10-Mar-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  27. 18-Feb-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  28. 19-Dec-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif

  29. 14-Oct-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif

  30. 19-Sep-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif

  31. 23-Jul-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif

  32. 06-Jul-2024

    Appearance

    District Munsif

  33. 10-Jun-2024

    Appearance

    District Munsif

  34. 12-Feb-2024

    Appearance

    District Munsif

  35. 04-Nov-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  36. 25-Sep-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  37. 26-Jun-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  38. 03-Jun-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  39. 24-Apr-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  40. 24-Mar-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  41. 23-Mar-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 76/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Munsiff Court, Kangayam allowed the application filed by the petitioners/defendants to accept an additional counter-claim in the original suit. The court granted the petition on the grounds that the additional counter-claim was necessary to substantiate the defendants' case and that they had not deliberately delayed filing it, conditioned upon payment of ₹1,000 costs to the opposite party by November 3, 2025, and both parties cooperating to expedite the main case proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case