D.Sivakumar vs Eswari and 3 others Advocate - S.Etteswaran — 49/2022

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section sec27(c). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI140000462022

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

28th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

58/2022

Filing Date

25-02-2022

Registration No

49/2022

Registration Date

25-02-2022

Court

District Munsif Court, Kangeyam

Judge

1-District Munsif

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section sec27(c)

Petitioner(s)

D.Sivakumar

Adv. R.Venkadasubbu

Respondent(s)

Eswari and 3 others Advocate - S.Etteswaran

Selvakumar

Adv. S.Etteswaran

Selvi

Adv. S.Etteswaran

Jothiraj

Adv. S.Etteswaran

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif

09-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

23-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

11-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

09-03-2026

Evidence

20-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

20-02-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The District Court in Kangayam dismissed the interim application (I.A. No. 2/2025) filed by the petitioners/defendants seeking a fresh court-appointed commissioner survey to re-examine a pathways boundary dispute. The court found that the earlier court commissioner's report (from a prior related case O.S. No. 317/2010) was already conclusive on the matter, and that conducting another survey would amount to revisiting settled findings without justification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District Court in Kangayam dismissed the interim application (I.A. No. 2/2025) filed by the petitioners/defendants seeking a fresh court-appointed commissioner survey to re-examine a pathways boundary dispute. The court found that the earlier court commissioner's report (from a prior related case O.S. No. 317/2010) was already conclusive on the matter, and that conducting another survey would amount to revisiting settled findings without justification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Kangeyam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case