Ponnusamy vs S.P.Samiappan and 20 others Advocate - Anguraj S — 201/2011
Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 37(2). Status: Orders. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI140000442011
Next Hearing
17th March 2026
Filing Date
28-06-2011
Registration No
201/2011
Registration Date
28-06-2011
Court
District Munsif Court, Kangeyam
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ponnusamy
Adv. Subramaniyan D
Kulandaisamy
Adv. Subramaniyan D
Respondent(s)
S.P.Samiappan and 20 others Advocate - Anguraj S
S.P.Ramasamy
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Orders
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Orders |
| 10-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 05-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 02-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 26-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a civil suit (Original Case No. 201/2011) before the District Civil Court, Kangeyam, heard on February 9, 2026. The court recorded the testimony of witness Suresh Tazil regarding a property dispute involving 93 acres of land (Thava Saathu) and the plaintiff's entitled share of 4 acres 66 cents. The court admitted the witness statement and cross-examination, confirming the plaintiff's proportionate share in the disputed property and approving the allocation of 14 acres to the plaintiffs without objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a civil suit (Original Case No. 201/2011) before the District Civil Court, Kangeyam, heard on February 9, 2026. The court recorded the testimony of witness Suresh Tazil regarding a property dispute involving 93 acres of land (Thava Saathu) and the plaintiff's entitled share of 4 acres 66 cents. The court admitted the witness statement and cross-examination, confirming the plaintiff's proportionate share in the disputed property and approving the allocation of 14 acres to the plaintiffs without objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts