Chellam vs Jayakannan Advocate - Lingasamy P — 29/2018
Case under Suitsvaluationact Section 25(b). Status: Additional Written Statement. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNTI140000322018
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
29/2018
Filing Date
02-02-2018
Registration No
29/2018
Registration Date
02-02-2018
Court
District Munsif Court, Kangeyam
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chellam
Adv. Sureshkumar C
Sathishkumar
Adv. Sureshkumar C
Manimegalai
Adv. Suresh Kumar C
Rameshkumar
Adv. Suresh Kumar C
Respondent(s)
Jayakannan Advocate - Lingasamy P
Rajathi
Adv. Lingasamy P
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Additional Written Statement
Amendment
Amendment
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Orders
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Additional Written Statement | |
| 10-04-2026 | Amendment | |
| 07-04-2026 | Amendment | |
| 02-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 17-03-2026 | Orders |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: I.A.6/2026 in O.S.No.29/2018, District Civil Court, Kangayam Date: 02.04.2026 Outcome: The petition was ALLOWED. The court permitted the plaintiffs/petitioners to amend the suit pleadings to correct the description of relief regarding the disputed document (Dawat/gift deed), specifically to reflect that it belongs solely to the 5th petitioner rather than jointly to petitioners 1-4. The court also imposed costs of ₹2,000 on the respondents, payable by 07.04.2026, and adjourned the case for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: I.A.6/2026 in O.S.No.29/2018, District Civil Court, Kangayam Date: 02.04.2026 Outcome: The petition was ALLOWED. The court permitted the plaintiffs/petitioners to amend the suit pleadings to correct the description of relief regarding the disputed document (Dawat/gift deed), specifically to reflect that it belongs solely to the 5th petitioner rather than jointly to petitioners 1-4. The court also imposed costs of ₹2,000 on the respondents, payable by 07.04.2026, and adjourned the case for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts