Pappathi vs Mylsamy Advocate - Vadivelsamy P — 13/2023
Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 25dand27C. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI140000172023
Filing Number
17/2023
Filing Date
05-Jan-2023
Registration No
13/2023
Registration Date
09-Jan-2023
Court
District Munsif Court, Kangeyam
Judge
1-District Munsif
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pappathi
Adv. Boobathy B
-
2.Arumugam
Adv. Boobathy B
-
3.Jayamani
Adv. Boobathy B
-
4.Nataraj
Adv. Boobathy B
-
5.Moganambal
Adv. Boobathy B
-
6.Krishnaveni
Adv. Boobathy B
-
7.Palanisamy Gounder
Adv. Boobathy B
-
8.Palaniyamal
Adv. Boobathy B
-
9.Poongothai
Adv. Boobathy B
-
10.Kalaivani
Adv. Boobathy B
-
11.Baby
Adv. Boobathy B
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mylsamy Advocate - Vadivelsamy P
Case History
-
17-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
11-Mar-2026
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
05-Mar-2026
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
Summary This is a property dispute case (O.S. No. 13/2023) from the District Civil Court, Kangayam, decided on March 5, 2026. The court examined witness testimony regarding rights of way and property boundaries between adjacent plots (No. 572 and 573). The court rejected several claims made by the plaintiffs (heirs of Chinna Kaunder) regarding access rights and ownership boundaries, finding that the defendants (heirs of Palaniswamy and Nachimuththu Kaunder) have no recorded title over plot 572 and therefore cannot prevent passage from plot 572 to plot 573. The case was decided on merits based on cross-examination of witnesses and documentary evidence regarding partition deeds from 1919 and 1958. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Mar-2026
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
02-Mar-2026
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
-
02-Mar-2026
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
23-Feb-2026
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
-
23-Feb-2026
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
16-Feb-2026
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
-
16-Feb-2026
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
10-Feb-2026
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
04-Feb-2026
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
-
04-Feb-2026
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
29-Jan-2026
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
21-Jan-2026
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
-
21-Jan-2026
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
12-Jan-2026
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
08-Jan-2026
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
09-Dec-2025
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
03-Dec-2025
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
13-Nov-2025
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
06-Nov-2025
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
01-Nov-2025
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
24-Oct-2025
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
15-Oct-2025
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
10-Oct-2025
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
-
10-Oct-2025
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
18-Sep-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
11-Aug-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
18-Jul-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
27-Jun-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
16-Jun-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
01-Apr-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
07-Mar-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
03-Feb-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
06-Dec-2024
Trial
District Munsif
-
06-Nov-2024
Trial
District Munsif
-
03-Sep-2024
Trial
District Munsif
-
18-Jul-2024
Trial
District Munsif
-
18-Jun-2024
Issues
District Munsif
-
28-Mar-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
20-Feb-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
27-Nov-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
30-Oct-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
29-Sep-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
21-Sep-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
23-Aug-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
28-Jun-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
23-Jun-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif
-
28-Apr-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif
-
10-Apr-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif
-
23-Mar-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif
-
09-Feb-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif
-
09-Jan-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jan-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 13/2023
Summary This is a property dispute case (O.S. No. 13/2023) from the District Civil Court, Kangayam, decided on March 5, 2026. The court examined witness testimony regarding rights of way and property boundaries between adjacent plots (No. 572 and 573). The court rejected several claims made by the plaintiffs (heirs of Chinna Kaunder) regarding access rights and ownership boundaries, finding that the defendants (heirs of Palaniswamy and Nachimuththu Kaunder) have no recorded title over plot 572 and therefore cannot prevent passage from plot 572 to plot 573. The case was decided on merits based on cross-examination of witnesses and documentary evidence regarding partition deeds from 1919 and 1958. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts