Vasanthi vs The President, Sarkar Kathanganni Union Panchayat Office, Tiruppur — 5/2024

Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 27(c). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Trial Next hearing 22-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI140000132024

Filing Number

13/2024

Filing Date

10-Jan-2024

Registration No

5/2024

Registration Date

24-Jan-2024

Court

District Munsif Court, Kangeyam

Judge

1-District Munsif

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Suits Valuation Act Section 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vasanthi

    Adv. Sivaranjith S

  2. 2.Palaniyammal

  3. 3.Palanathaal

  4. 4.Nanjammal

  5. 5.Eswari

  6. 6.Shanthi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The President, Sarkar Kathanganni Union Panchayat Office, Tiruppur

  2. 2.The Thasildar

  3. 3.The Urban and Rural Planning Officer, Tiruppur

  4. 4.The Village Administrative Officer

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif

  4. 06-Feb-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif

  5. 18-Dec-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  6. 24-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  7. 23-Oct-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  8. 11-Sep-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  9. 30-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  10. 24-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  11. 09-Apr-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  12. 05-Mar-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  13. 10-Feb-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  14. 03-Feb-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  15. 04-Dec-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif

  16. 05-Nov-2024

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  17. 05-Nov-2024

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Order Summary Petition Allowed. The District Munsif Court, Kangayam allowed an I.A. (Interlocutory Application) seeking to set aside a previous order dated 11.06.2024. The court found that the petitioners/defendants were denied a fair opportunity to file their counter-statement due to administrative delays, and therefore set aside the default order against them and permitted the petition. The court reasoned that granting another opportunity to the petitioners to present their defense aligns with justice principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  18. 05-Nov-2024

    Appearance

    District Munsif

  19. 17-Oct-2024

    Orders

    District Munsif

  20. 12-Sep-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  21. 20-Aug-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  22. 16-Aug-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  23. 11-Jun-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  24. 17-Apr-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  25. 26-Feb-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  26. 24-Jan-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 10-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Petition Allowed. The District Munsif Court, Kangayam allowed an I.A. (Interlocutory Application) seeking to set aside a previous order dated 11.06.2024. The court found that the petitioners/defendants were denied a fair opportunity to file their counter-statement due to administrative delays, and therefore set aside the default order against them and permitted the petition. The court reasoned that granting another opportunity to the petitioners to present their defense aligns with justice principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case