G.Palanivel vs Kalaiyarasi and 6 others Advocate - L.Prabhakaran — 4/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section sec25(d). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI140000052022
Filing Number
8/2022
Filing Date
05-Jan-2022
Registration No
4/2022
Registration Date
07-Jan-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Kangeyam
Judge
1-District Munsif
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.G.Palanivel
Adv. E.S.Ranjith
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kalaiyarasi and 6 others Advocate - L.Prabhakaran
-
2.Minor Dhanusri
Adv. L.Prabhakaran
-
3.Minor Dhatchana
Adv. L.Prabhakaran
-
4.Palaniyammal
Adv. L.Prabhakaran
-
5.Usha Nandhini
Adv. L.Prabhakaran
-
6.Annakkodi
Adv. L.Prabhakaran
-
7.Tamilselvi
Adv. L.Prabhakaran
Case History
-
18-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Munsif
-
09-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Munsif
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
19-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
09-Dec-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
03-Dec-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
04-Nov-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
28-Oct-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
22-Oct-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
17-Sep-2025
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
Summary: In Original Case No. 4/2022 before the District Civil Court, Kangayam, heard on September 17, 2025, the court recorded the cross-examination testimony of the 7th defendant regarding property transactions and partition of "Thava" lands. The court rejected the plaintiff's claims that defendants were responsible for typographical errors in the property documents (specifically the conversion of survey number 364/3L1A to 346/1) and found the defendants bear no liability for such clerical mistakes. The witness testimony was recorded, verified, and accepted by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Sep-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
11-Sep-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
26-Aug-2025
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
-
26-Aug-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
12-Aug-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
05-Aug-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
14-Jul-2025
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
-
14-Jul-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
30-Jun-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
24-Jun-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
09-Apr-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
14-Mar-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
10-Mar-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
06-Feb-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
07-Jan-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
02-Dec-2024
Trial
District Munsif
-
30-Sep-2024
Trial
District Munsif
-
16-Aug-2024
Trial
District Munsif
-
18-Jun-2024
Issues
District Munsif
-
04-Mar-2024
Issues
District Munsif
-
29-Jan-2024
Issues
District Munsif
-
03-Jan-2024
Issues
District Munsif
-
04-Nov-2023
Issues
District Munsif
-
18-Sep-2023
Issues
District Munsif
-
09-Aug-2023
Issues
District Munsif
-
10-Jul-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
07-Jun-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
14-Mar-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
27-Feb-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
27-Jan-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
22-Dec-2022
Issue of Service
District Munsif
-
22-Nov-2022
Issue of Service
District Munsif
-
03-Oct-2022
Issue of Service
District Munsif
-
11-Jul-2022
Issue of Service
District Munsif
-
29-Apr-2022
Issue of Service
District Munsif
-
06-Apr-2022
Issue of Service
District Munsif
-
07-Feb-2022
Issue of Service
District Munsif
-
07-Jan-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jan-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 4/2022
Summary: In Original Case No. 4/2022 before the District Civil Court, Kangayam, heard on September 17, 2025, the court recorded the cross-examination testimony of the 7th defendant regarding property transactions and partition of "Thava" lands. The court rejected the plaintiff's claims that defendants were responsible for typographical errors in the property documents (specifically the conversion of survey number 364/3L1A to 346/1) and found the defendants bear no liability for such clerical mistakes. The witness testimony was recorded, verified, and accepted by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts