Inspector Of Police Perumanallur Ps vs PRABHAKARAN — 3069/2025

Case under Tn Gaming Act, 1930 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--Judgement on admission on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNTI130067802025

e-Filing Number

16-12-2025

Filing Number

6780/2025

Filing Date

29-Dec-2025

Registration No

3069/2025

Registration Date

29-Dec-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Avinashi

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Judgement on admission

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

611

Police Station

Perumanallur Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Tn Gaming Act, 1930 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector Of Police Perumanallur Ps (Police Station)

    Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE PERUMANALLUR POLICE STATION

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRABHAKARAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate Court, Avinashi convicted accused Prabhakaran under Section 12 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Smoking and Non-Smokers Health Protection Act after he admitted guilt and pleaded guilty. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 400 (Rs. 100 per week for one week I.D.S.I) and confiscated Rs. 700, with other seized property to be destroyed or returned to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 29-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 29-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3069/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court, Avinashi convicted accused Prabhakaran under Section 12 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Smoking and Non-Smokers Health Protection Act after he admitted guilt and pleaded guilty. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 400 (Rs. 100 per week for one week I.D.S.I) and confiscated Rs. 700, with other seized property to be destroyed or returned to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case