Sivasankar vs The Inspector of police,Perumanallur P.S — 274/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTI130009902026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
990/2026
Filing Date
04-03-2026
Registration No
274/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Avinashi
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
24
Police Station
Perumanallur Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sivasankar
Respondent(s)
The Inspector of police,Perumanallur P.S
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 09-03-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 06-03-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 04-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate Court at Avinashi granted interim custody of seized gold items (3 sovereign gold aaram, 1½ sovereign gold chain, 1½ sovereign ear shed, ½ sovereign gold ring) to petitioner Sivakumar, the rightful owner, relying on Supreme Court guidelines in Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat. The custody was granted conditionally, requiring the petitioner to execute a Rs. 5,00,000 bond, provide photographs, prepare panchanama documents, and not modify the property without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial Magistrate Court at Avinashi granted interim custody of seized gold items (3 sovereign gold aaram, 1½ sovereign gold chain, 1½ sovereign ear shed, ½ sovereign gold ring) to petitioner Sivakumar, the rightful owner, relying on Supreme Court guidelines in Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat. The custody was granted conditionally, requiring the petitioner to execute a Rs. 5,00,000 bond, provide photographs, prepare panchanama documents, and not modify the property without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts