Esakkimuthu vs Inspector of Police, Perumanallur Police Station — 271/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTI130009372026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

937/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

271/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Avinashi

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

35

Police Station

Perumanallur Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Esakkimuthu

    Adv. Subhash Arjun

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Perumanallur Police Station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court, Avinashi granted bail to Esakkimuthu, arrested on charges under sections 331(4) and 305(a) of BNS, after 37 days of judicial custody. The court imposed strict conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, mandatory police station appearances for 60 days, prohibition on witness tampering, and identity verification requirements, while rejecting the prosecution's opposition based on the accused's prior criminal history and lengthy custody period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 271/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court, Avinashi granted bail to Esakkimuthu, arrested on charges under sections 331(4) and 305(a) of BNS, after 37 days of judicial custody. The court imposed strict conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, mandatory police station appearances for 60 days, prohibition on witness tampering, and identity verification requirements, while rejecting the prosecution's opposition based on the accused's prior criminal history and lengthy custody period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case