A.Balasubramanian vs Kandhaswamy — 133/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI120001652020
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
Filing Number
200/2020
Filing Date
09-09-2020
Registration No
133/2020
Registration Date
09-09-2020
Court
District Munsif Court, Avinashi
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
A.Balasubramanian
Adv. Bharathi Raja
Respondent(s)
Kandhaswamy
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 10-02-2026 | Part Heard |
| 02-01-2026 | Part Heard |
| 09-12-2025 | Part Heard |
| 25-11-2025 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This is a Tamil language civil suit (O.S. No. 133/2020) from the District Civil Court, Avinashi, dated July 3, 2025. The document records the cross-examination of Witness 2 (P.W-2), Masti Muthu, regarding a property dispute involving a temple site (Rasathammamman Temple) and adjoining land. The witness testified about property ownership, rental collections, unauthorized encroachments, and construction activities on the disputed premises. The cross-examination of the 5th defendant's counsel was adjourned, and the witness statement was recorded and authenticated by the judge. No final order (judgment, bail grant/denial, or case dismissal) has been issued—this is an interim procedural order documenting witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Tamil language civil suit (O.S. No. 133/2020) from the District Civil Court, Avinashi, dated July 3, 2025. The document records the cross-examination of Witness 2 (P.W-2), Masti Muthu, regarding a property dispute involving a temple site (Rasathammamman Temple) and adjoining land. The witness testified about property ownership, rental collections, unauthorized encroachments, and construction activities on the disputed premises. The cross-examination of the 5th defendant's counsel was adjourned, and the witness statement was recorded and authenticated by the judge. No final order (judgment, bail grant/denial, or case dismissal) has been issued—this is an interim procedural order documenting witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts