S.Palanisamy vs R.NAtarajan Advocate - K.Marudhachalam — 125/2014
Case under Suitsvaluationact Section 27C. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI120000972014
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Date
07-07-2014
Registration No
125/2014
Registration Date
07-07-2014
Court
District Munsif Court, Avinashi
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S.Palanisamy
Adv. Thirunavukarasu D
Respondent(s)
R.NAtarajan Advocate - K.Marudhachalam
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Amendment
Amendment
Amendment
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Amendment | |
| 06-02-2026 | Amendment | |
| 16-12-2025 | Amendment | |
| 10-11-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 15-10-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition (I.M. No. 864/2022) filed in a civil property dispute case (O.S. No. 125/2014) before the District Munsif Court, Avinashi was allowed. The court appointed advocate V. Hariharan as court commissioner with the fee of Rs. 12,000/- (to be paid by 30.10.2023) to conduct a local investigation with the help of a government surveyor, measure the disputed property, and submit a detailed report and map to ascertain whether illegal encroachment has occurred on the plaintiff's western boundary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition (I.M. No. 864/2022) filed in a civil property dispute case (O.S. No. 125/2014) before the District Munsif Court, Avinashi was allowed. The court appointed advocate V. Hariharan as court commissioner with the fee of Rs. 12,000/- (to be paid by 30.10.2023) to conduct a local investigation with the help of a government surveyor, measure the disputed property, and submit a detailed report and map to ascertain whether illegal encroachment has occurred on the plaintiff's western boundary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts