Pavithra vs N.Velusamy Advocate - Ramesh K — 100641/2012
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 37(2). Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNTI120000922012
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
100641/2012
Filing Date
24-09-2012
Registration No
100641/2012
Registration Date
24-09-2012
Court
District Munsif Court, Avinashi
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pavithra
Adv. Arumugam A
Respondent(s)
N.Velusamy Advocate - Ramesh K
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Amendment
Amendment
Amendment
Amendment
Amendment
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Amendment | |
| 11-03-2026 | Amendment | |
| 09-03-2026 | Amendment | |
| 25-02-2026 | Amendment | |
| 05-01-2026 | Amendment |
Interim Orders
Case Summary The District Civil Court at Avinashi, dated August 27, 2024, allowed an Interlocutory Application (IA No. 636/2023) to add defendants 13-20 as parties to the partition suit (OS No. 641/2012), while dismissing the application insofar as it pertains to defendant 17 (deceased). The court found that these additional defendants had acquired property documents in violation of law while the original suit was pending, necessitating their inclusion to completely adjudicate all disputes involved in the partition case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The District Civil Court at Avinashi, dated August 27, 2024, allowed an Interlocutory Application (IA No. 636/2023) to add defendants 13-20 as parties to the partition suit (OS No. 641/2012), while dismissing the application insofar as it pertains to defendant 17 (deceased). The court found that these additional defendants had acquired property documents in violation of law while the original suit was pending, necessitating their inclusion to completely adjudicate all disputes involved in the partition case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts