Chandrasekar vs Pandi R — 1751/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Issue of Service. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.

Issue of Service Next hearing 07-May-2026 this date has passed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNTI110042042025

e-Filing Number

04-11-2025

Filing Number

4204/2025

Filing Date

27-Dec-2025

Registration No

1751/2025

Registration Date

27-Dec-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chandrasekar

    Adv. Vigneshkarthick Krishnaswamy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pandi R

Case History

  1. 07-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF

    This is a witness affidavit (वाक्कुमूलम्/வாக்குமூலம்) from case STC 1751 of 2025 before the District Munsif Court, Palladam, recorded on 05.03.2026. Witness PW1 (Chandrasekhar) affirmed his deposition under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, confirming the truth of his statements and submitting supporting documents including a cash receipt for ₹1,00,000, a refund note, lawyer's notice, and postal communication dated between August-September 2025. The witness testimony was recorded with the judge's certification that it was accurately transcribed and verified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  4. 06-Feb-2026

    Sworn Statement

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  5. 27-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1751/2025

casestatus.in Summary

This is a witness affidavit (वाक्कुमूलम्/வாக்குமூலம்) from case STC 1751 of 2025 before the District Munsif Court, Palladam, recorded on 05.03.2026. Witness PW1 (Chandrasekhar) affirmed his deposition under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, confirming the truth of his statements and submitting supporting documents including a cash receipt for ₹1,00,000, a refund note, lawyer's notice, and postal communication dated between August-September 2025. The witness testimony was recorded with the judge's certification that it was accurately transcribed and verified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case