Chandrasekar vs Pandi R — 1751/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Issue of Service. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNTI110042042025

Issue of Service

Next Hearing

07th May 2026

e-Filing Number

04-11-2025

Filing Number

4204/2025

Filing Date

27-12-2025

Registration No

1751/2025

Registration Date

27-12-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142

Petitioner(s)

Chandrasekar

Adv. Vigneshkarthick Krishnaswamy

Respondent(s)

Pandi R

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

05-03-2026

Issue of Service

06-02-2026

Sworn Statement

27-12-2025

Issue of Service

Interim Orders

05-03-2026
Copy of Deposition / Witness

This is a witness affidavit (वाक्कुमूलम्/வாக்குமூலம்) from case STC 1751 of 2025 before the District Munsif Court, Palladam, recorded on 05.03.2026. Witness PW1 (Chandrasekhar) affirmed his deposition under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, confirming the truth of his statements and submitting supporting documents including a cash receipt for ₹1,00,000, a refund note, lawyer's notice, and postal communication dated between August-September 2025. The witness testimony was recorded with the judge's certification that it was accurately transcribed and verified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a witness affidavit (वाक्कुमूलम्/வாக்குமூலம்) from case STC 1751 of 2025 before the District Munsif Court, Palladam, recorded on 05.03.2026. Witness PW1 (Chandrasekhar) affirmed his deposition under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, confirming the truth of his statements and submitting supporting documents including a cash receipt for ₹1,00,000, a refund note, lawyer's notice, and postal communication dated between August-September 2025. The witness testimony was recorded with the judge's certification that it was accurately transcribed and verified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case