Sivarajkumar Rep by Power agen Yasar Arafath vs Arulkumar Advocate - P.V.Prakash — 1707/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Questioning. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNTI110028002024

Questioning

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

e-Filing Number

11-08-2024

Filing Number

2799/2024

Filing Date

22-08-2024

Registration No

1707/2024

Registration Date

22-08-2024

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138
Mp/1/2024 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section Sivarajkumar Rep by Power agen Yasar ArafathArulkumar
Mp/2/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section ArulkumarSivarajkumar Rep by Power agen Yasar Arafath
Mp/4/2025 Classification : Others Section Sivarajkumar Rep by Power agen Yasar Arafath

Petitioner(s)

Sivarajkumar Rep by Power agen Yasar Arafath

Adv. Moorthy V

Respondent(s)

Arulkumar Advocate - P.V.Prakash

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

05-03-2026

Questioning

06-02-2026

Part Heard

04-12-2025

Part Heard

07-11-2025

Part Heard

09-10-2025

Part Heard

Interim Orders

18-10-2024
Copy of Deposition / Witness

This document is a witness affidavit (PW 1) filed in Criminal Case STC 1707 of 2024 before the Judicial Magistrate Court in Palladam on 18.10.2024. The complainant, Yaser Arafat (31 years old), affirmed his sworn statement under Section 223 BNSS, submitting six documentary exhibits including bank statements from Yes Bank and ICIC Bank, legal notices, and a debt bond dated 09.12.2023, and requested a judgment in favor of his complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a witness affidavit (PW 1) filed in Criminal Case STC 1707 of 2024 before the Judicial Magistrate Court in Palladam on 18.10.2024. The complainant, Yaser Arafat (31 years old), affirmed his sworn statement under Section 223 BNSS, submitting six documentary exhibits including bank statements from Yes Bank and ICIC Bank, legal notices, and a debt bond dated 09.12.2023, and requested a judgment in favor of his complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case