The Sub Inspector of Police, Kamanaickenpalayam Police Station vs Vellinyangiri — 292/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 10th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTI110018432023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1834/2023
Filing Date
11-10-2023
Registration No
292/2023
Registration Date
11-10-2023
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
122
Police Station
Kamanikanpalayam Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Sub Inspector of Police, Kamanaickenpalayam Police Station
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Vellinyangiri
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 27-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 25-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Palladam District Magistrate Court acquitted the accused (Velliyangiri, age 40) of charges under IPC sections 294(b) and 324, finding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Although the complainant initially alleged that the accused assaulted him with a wooden stick, the court noted that the victim's testimony contradicted the prosecution's case, and no independent witness testimony corroborated the charges, leading to the accused's acquittal and release under CrPC section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary The Palladam District Magistrate Court acquitted the accused (Velliyangiri, age 40) of charges under IPC sections 294(b) and 324, finding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Although the complainant initially alleged that the accused assaulted him with a wooden stick, the court noted that the victim's testimony contradicted the prosecution's case, and no independent witness testimony corroborated the charges, leading to the accused's acquittal and release under CrPC section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts