The Sub Inspector of Police, Kamanaickenpalayam Police Station vs Vellinyangiri — 292/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTI110018432023

Filing Number

1834/2023

Filing Date

11-Oct-2023

Registration No

292/2023

Registration Date

11-Oct-2023

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

122

Police Station

Kamanikanpalayam Police Station

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Sub Inspector of Police, Kamanaickenpalayam Police Station

    Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vellinyangiri

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary The Palladam District Magistrate Court acquitted the accused (Velliyangiri, age 40) of charges under IPC sections 294(b) and 324, finding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Although the complainant initially alleged that the accused assaulted him with a wooden stick, the court noted that the victim's testimony contradicted the prosecution's case, and no independent witness testimony corroborated the charges, leading to the accused's acquittal and release under CrPC section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  9. 03-Mar-2026

    Remand

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  10. 18-Feb-2026

    Remand

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  11. 12-Feb-2026

    Remand

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  12. 02-Feb-2026

    Remand

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  13. 19-Jan-2026

    Remand

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  14. 13-Nov-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  15. 02-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  16. 10-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  17. 03-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  18. 14-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  19. 04-Dec-2024

    Lok Adalat

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  20. 12-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  21. 24-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  22. 15-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  23. 10-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  24. 13-Sep-2024

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  25. 18-Jul-2024

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  26. 13-Jun-2024

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  27. 23-May-2024

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  28. 24-Apr-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  29. 28-Mar-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  30. 21-Feb-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  31. 25-Jan-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  32. 02-Nov-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  33. 11-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 11-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 292/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Palladam District Magistrate Court acquitted the accused (Velliyangiri, age 40) of charges under IPC sections 294(b) and 324, finding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Although the complainant initially alleged that the accused assaulted him with a wooden stick, the court noted that the victim's testimony contradicted the prosecution's case, and no independent witness testimony corroborated the charges, leading to the accused's acquittal and release under CrPC section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case