Gt Process Partnership Firm Rep By Its Power Agent Venugopal vs Hns International, Rep By Its Proprietor C Rathna Kumar Advocate - Karthick S — 2060/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 142. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNTI110016982024

Part Heard

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

e-Filing Number

29-06-2024

Filing Number

1698/2024

Filing Date

25-06-2024

Registration No

2060/2024

Registration Date

25-10-2024

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 142
Code of Criminal Procedure Section 200
Mp/1/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Hns International, Rep By Its Proprietor C Rathna KumarGt Process Partnership Firm Rep By Its Power Agent Venugopal
Mp/2/2025 Classification : Others Section Gt Process Partnership Firm Rep By Its Power Agent Venugopal
Mp/4/2025 Classification : Others Section Gt Process Partnership Firm Rep By Its Power Agent Venugopal

Petitioner(s)

Gt Process Partnership Firm Rep By Its Power Agent Venugopal

Adv. MAHESH kumar

Respondent(s)

Hns International, Rep By Its Proprietor C Rathna Kumar Advocate - Karthick S

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

05-03-2026

Part Heard

05-02-2026

Part Heard

11-12-2025

Part Heard

13-11-2025

Part Heard

09-10-2025

Part Heard

Interim Orders

05-03-2026
Copy of Deposition / Witness

Court Order Summary Case No: STC.No. 2060/2024 | Date: 05.03.2026 This is a cross-examination transcript of PW 1 (Witness Venugopal) in a commercial dispute involving purchase orders, invoices, and inventory management between two trading entities. The witness, a B.Com graduate employed since 2003, testified about the company's accounting practices, credit terms (60-90 days), opening balances from 01.04.2023, and documentary evidence including purchase orders and inventory lists. The court recorded the witness's examination, which was conducted with direct typing, corrections made by the witness, and signed as accurate. Outcome: The witness examination was completed and recorded; no specific order regarding bail, dismissal, or adjournment is stated in this excerpt—this appears to be an intermediate procedural hearing documenting testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case No: STC.No. 2060/2024 | Date: 05.03.2026 This is a cross-examination transcript of PW 1 (Witness Venugopal) in a commercial dispute involving purchase orders, invoices, and inventory management between two trading entities. The witness, a B.Com graduate employed since 2003, testified about the company's accounting practices, credit terms (60-90 days), opening balances from 01.04.2023, and documentary evidence including purchase orders and inventory lists. The court recorded the witness's examination, which was conducted with direct typing, corrections made by the witness, and signed as accurate. Outcome: The witness examination was completed and recorded; no specific order regarding bail, dismissal, or adjournment is stated in this excerpt—this appears to be an intermediate procedural hearing documenting testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case