Gt Process Partnership Firm Rep By Its Power Agent Venugopal vs Hns International, Rep By Its Proprietor C Rathna Kumar Advocate - Karthick S — 2060/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 142. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

Part Heard Next hearing 27-Mar-2026 this date has passed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNTI110016982024

e-Filing Number

29-06-2024

Filing Number

1698/2024

Filing Date

25-Jun-2024

Registration No

2060/2024

Registration Date

25-Oct-2024

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 142
Code of Criminal Procedure Section 200

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gt Process Partnership Firm Rep By Its Power Agent Venugopal

    Adv. MAHESH kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Hns International, Rep By Its Proprietor C Rathna Kumar Advocate - Karthick S

Case History

  1. 27-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF

    Court Order Summary Case No: STC.No. 2060/2024 | Date: 05.03.2026 This is a cross-examination transcript of PW 1 (Witness Venugopal) in a commercial dispute involving purchase orders, invoices, and inventory management between two trading entities. The witness, a B.Com graduate employed since 2003, testified about the company's accounting practices, credit terms (60-90 days), opening balances from 01.04.2023, and documentary evidence including purchase orders and inventory lists. The court recorded the witness's examination, which was conducted with direct typing, corrections made by the witness, and signed as accurate. Outcome: The witness examination was completed and recorded; no specific order regarding bail, dismissal, or adjournment is stated in this excerpt—this appears to be an intermediate procedural hearing documenting testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  4. 05-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  5. 11-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  6. 13-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  7. 09-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  8. 28-Aug-2025

    Counter

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  9. 25-Jul-2025

    Counter

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  10. 19-Jun-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  11. 06-Jun-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  12. 01-Apr-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  13. 31-Jan-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  14. 09-Jan-2025

    Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF

  15. 09-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  16. 29-Nov-2024

    Sworn Statement

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  17. 14-Nov-2024

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  18. 25-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 25-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2060/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case No: STC.No. 2060/2024 | Date: 05.03.2026 This is a cross-examination transcript of PW 1 (Witness Venugopal) in a commercial dispute involving purchase orders, invoices, and inventory management between two trading entities. The witness, a B.Com graduate employed since 2003, testified about the company's accounting practices, credit terms (60-90 days), opening balances from 01.04.2023, and documentary evidence including purchase orders and inventory lists. The court recorded the witness's examination, which was conducted with direct typing, corrections made by the witness, and signed as accurate. Outcome: The witness examination was completed and recorded; no specific order regarding bail, dismissal, or adjournment is stated in this excerpt—this appears to be an intermediate procedural hearing documenting testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case