VINODH vs ISMAIL Advocate - Muthukrishnan S — 273/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNTI110016682023

Part Heard

Next Hearing

09th April 2026

e-Filing Number

26-09-2023

Filing Number

1659/2023

Filing Date

26-09-2023

Registration No

273/2024

Registration Date

29-02-2024

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142
Mp/1/2024 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section VINODHISMAIL
Mp/2/2024 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section VINODHISMAIL
Mp/3/2024 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section VINODHISMAIL
Mp/4/2024 Classification : Others Section VINODHISMAIL

Petitioner(s)

VINODH

Adv. Amarnath A

Respondent(s)

ISMAIL Advocate - Muthukrishnan S

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

05-03-2026

Part Heard

22-01-2026

Part Heard

12-12-2025

Part Heard

20-11-2025

Part Heard

17-10-2025

Part Heard

Interim Orders

25-09-2025
Copy of Deposition / Witness

This document records the sworn affidavit of Witness 2 (PW 2), Sri Ramakrishnan, in case STC 273 of 2024 before the Criminal Court at Palladam on 25.09.2025. The witness affirmed his statement in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, confirming the truthfulness of the contents and his signatures on the affidavit. This is a witness examination record, not a substantive court order on bail, petition, or case outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document records the sworn affidavit of Witness 2 (PW 2), Sri Ramakrishnan, in case STC 273 of 2024 before the Criminal Court at Palladam on 25.09.2025. The witness affirmed his statement in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, confirming the truthfulness of the contents and his signatures on the affidavit. This is a witness examination record, not a substantive court order on bail, petition, or case outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case