Mohan Prabhu vs Boobathy — 1646/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138, 142. Status: Mediation. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNTI110011852024

Mediation

Next Hearing

08th May 2026

e-Filing Number

13-04-2024

Filing Number

1185/2024

Filing Date

23-05-2024

Registration No

1646/2024

Registration Date

12-08-2024

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138, 142
Mp/1/2025 Classification : Others Section BoobathyMohan Prabhu
Mp/2/2025 Classification : 70 Cr.pc Section BoobathyMohan Prabhu

Petitioner(s)

Mohan Prabhu

Adv. Moorthy V

Respondent(s)

Boobathy

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

05-03-2026

Mediation

11-12-2025

Mediation

13-11-2025

Mediation

04-09-2025

Mediation

24-07-2025

Part Heard

Interim Orders

01-10-2024
Copy of Deposition / Witness

This document is a witness affidavit/statement, not a court order with a final judgment or decision. PW1 (Witness 1) Maganprabhu, a 41-year-old cutting contractor, solemnly affirmed his statement on 01.10.2024 before the Judicial Magistrate Court in Palladam under Section 223 BNSS, submitting documentary evidence (bank statements, legal notices, and acknowledgment receipts) in support of the complaint (Case STC 1646 of 2024). No judicial order granting/denying bail, allowing/dismissing petitions, or final verdict is contained in this document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a witness affidavit/statement, not a court order with a final judgment or decision. PW1 (Witness 1) Maganprabhu, a 41-year-old cutting contractor, solemnly affirmed his statement on 01.10.2024 before the Judicial Magistrate Court in Palladam under Section 223 BNSS, submitting documentary evidence (bank statements, legal notices, and acknowledgment receipts) in support of the complaint (Case STC 1646 of 2024). No judicial order granting/denying bail, allowing/dismissing petitions, or final verdict is contained in this document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case