Inpector of police, AV palayam vs Agamadullah — 200135/2018

Case under Mp/1/2023 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section AgamadullahInpector of police, AV palayam. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTI110010912018

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

200135/2018

Filing Date

24-04-2018

Registration No

200135/2018

Registration Date

24-04-2018

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Acts & Sections

MP/1/2023 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section AgamadullahInpector of police, AV palayam
MP/2/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section AgamadullahInpector of police, AV palayam
MP/3/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section AgamadullahInpector of police, AV palayam
MP/5/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section AgamadullahInpector of police, AV palayam
MP/6/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section AgamadullahInpector of police, AV palayam
MP/7/2025 Classification : Others Section AgamadullahInpector of police, AV palayam
MP/9/2025 Classification : Others Section Inpector of police, AV palayam
MP/10/2025 Classification : Others Section AgamadullahInpector of police, AV palayam
MP/12/2026 Classification : Others Section AgamadullahInpector of police, AV palayam

Petitioner(s)

Inpector of police, AV palayam

Respondent(s)

Agamadullah

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

09-03-2026

Disposed

24-02-2026

Judgement

23-02-2026

Arguments

11-02-2026

Part Heard

28-01-2026

Part Heard

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Court Judgment Summary The court acquitted the accused, Ahamedullah, of charges under IPC sections 279 (rash driving), 338 (causing hurt), and 304(A) (causing death by negligence) in a motor vehicle accident case. The judge found that the prosecution's eyewitness testimonies were inconsistent and unreliable—witnesses contradicted themselves regarding vehicle registration numbers, distances, visibility, and timing—failing to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt despite evidence of a collision resulting in one death and injuries to two others. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Court Judgment Summary The court acquitted the accused, Ahamedullah, of charges under IPC sections 279 (rash driving), 338 (causing hurt), and 304(A) (causing death by negligence) in a motor vehicle accident case. The judge found that the prosecution's eyewitness testimonies were inconsistent and unreliable—witnesses contradicted themselves regarding vehicle registration numbers, distances, visibility, and timing—failing to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt despite evidence of a collision resulting in one death and injuries to two others. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case