MANIKANDAN vs ALEXANDER — 671/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.

Enquiry Next hearing 24-Mar-2026 this date has passed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNTI110010602023

e-Filing Number

11-01-2023

Filing Number

1060/2023

Filing Date

07-Jul-2023

Registration No

671/2023

Registration Date

07-Jul-2023

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANIKANDAN

    Adv. Deva S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ALEXANDER

Case History

  1. 24-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  3. 20-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  6. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  7. 04-Dec-2025

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  8. 13-Nov-2025

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  9. 26-Sep-2025

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  10. 25-Sep-2025

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  11. 31-Jul-2025

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  12. 23-May-2025

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  13. 28-Feb-2025

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  14. 06-Dec-2024

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  15. 13-Sep-2024

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  16. 29-Aug-2024

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  17. 14-Jun-2024

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  18. 04-Jun-2024

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  19. 09-May-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  20. 23-Apr-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  21. 12-Apr-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  22. 02-Apr-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  23. 05-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  24. 03-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  25. 10-Jan-2024

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  26. 29-Dec-2023

    Copies

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  27. 30-Oct-2023

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  28. 21-Sep-2023

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  29. 15-Sep-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  30. 11-Aug-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  31. 07-Jul-2023

    Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF

    The court recorded the affidavit and sworn testimony of PW1 (Thirumanikandan) in case STC 671 of 2023 before the Criminal Court, Palladam on 07.07.2023 under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. The witness affirmed the truthfulness of his examination-in-chief statement and authenticated documentary evidence including cheques, bank memos, and identification documents. The case was proceeded with following Supreme Court guidelines for expeditious trial of Negotiable Instruments Act cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  32. 07-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 07-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 671/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The court recorded the affidavit and sworn testimony of PW1 (Thirumanikandan) in case STC 671 of 2023 before the Criminal Court, Palladam on 07.07.2023 under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. The witness affirmed the truthfulness of his examination-in-chief statement and authenticated documentary evidence including cheques, bank memos, and identification documents. The case was proceeded with following Supreme Court guidelines for expeditious trial of Negotiable Instruments Act cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case