Inspector of police, KN palayam vs Kathiravan — 107/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(a). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTI110008932019

Part Heard

Next Hearing

27th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

889/2019

Filing Date

19-11-2019

Registration No

107/2019

Registration Date

19-11-2019

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

FIR Details

FIR Number

342

Police Station

Kamanikanpalayam Police Station

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 279,304(a)
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 146,196,190(2)
MP/1/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section KathiravanInspector of police, KN palayam
MP/2/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section KathiravanInspector of police, KN palayam

Petitioner(s)

Inspector of police, KN palayam

Adv. Sivakumar S

Respondent(s)

Kathiravan

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

07-04-2026

Part Heard

06-04-2026

Part Heard

30-03-2026

Part Heard

25-03-2026

Part Heard

23-03-2026

Part Heard

Interim Orders

23-03-2026
Copy of Deposition / Witness

This document is a witness affidavit/deposition (PW 5 - Arun Kumar) recorded on 23.03.2026 in Criminal Case CC 107 of 2019 before the Magistrate Court at Palladam, Tamil Nadu. The witness testified regarding his presence at a company location on 16.09.2019 and provided a site map/diagram as evidence, which was cross-examined by the opposing counsel. The affidavit was solemnly affirmed under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, with the witness confirming the accuracy of his statement after review. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a witness affidavit/deposition (PW 5 - Arun Kumar) recorded on 23.03.2026 in Criminal Case CC 107 of 2019 before the Magistrate Court at Palladam, Tamil Nadu. The witness testified regarding his presence at a company location on 16.09.2019 and provided a site map/diagram as evidence, which was cross-examined by the opposing counsel. The affidavit was solemnly affirmed under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, with the witness confirming the accuracy of his statement after review. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case