Food safety officer, palladam vs Kristopher paulraj — 418/2021
Case under Food Safety and Standards Act 2006 Section 51, 59(1), 63. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTI110006182021
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
Filing Number
618/2021
Filing Date
26-08-2021
Registration No
418/2021
Registration Date
26-08-2021
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Food safety officer, palladam
Adv. app
Respondent(s)
Kristopher paulraj
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 18-02-2026 | Part Heard |
| 09-02-2026 | Part Heard |
| 15-10-2025 | Part Heard |
| 24-06-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No: STC 418 of 2021 | Court: Criminal Magistrate Court, Palladam Date: 21.08.2024 This is a witness examination document (PW 1 testimony) in a food safety case. A Food Safety Officer testified that on 25.06.2020, he inspected a supermarket, purchased a 2kg butter sample without proper license authorization, divided it into sealed portions, and sent it for analysis. The NABL laboratory report confirmed the butter was unsafe and substandard. The accused (shop owner Christopher Balaraj) was issued a notice under Food Safety and Standards Act 2006, Section 31, and subsequently faced prosecution charges. The cross-examination by the accused's counsel was deferred under Section 355 BNSS with consent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No: STC 418 of 2021 | Court: Criminal Magistrate Court, Palladam Date: 21.08.2024 This is a witness examination document (PW 1 testimony) in a food safety case. A Food Safety Officer testified that on 25.06.2020, he inspected a supermarket, purchased a 2kg butter sample without proper license authorization, divided it into sealed portions, and sent it for analysis. The NABL laboratory report confirmed the butter was unsafe and substandard. The accused (shop owner Christopher Balaraj) was issued a notice under Food Safety and Standards Act 2006, Section 31, and subsequently faced prosecution charges. The cross-examination by the accused's counsel was deferred under Section 355 BNSS with consent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts