Shanmugam vs Vijayakumar and CBC Fashions pvt ltd. — 398/2021
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTI110005642021
Filing Number
564/2021
Filing Date
04-Aug-2021
Registration No
398/2021
Registration Date
04-Aug-2021
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shanmugam
Adv. Sakthivel P
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vijayakumar and CBC Fashions pvt ltd.
Case History
-
26-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Mar-2026
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
20-Feb-2026
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
19-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
04-Dec-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
06-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
16-Oct-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
25-Sep-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
12-Sep-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
21-Aug-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
19-Jun-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
30-May-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
24-Apr-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
27-Mar-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
20-Mar-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
20-Feb-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
07-Feb-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
06-Feb-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
09-Jan-2025
CMPPending
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
12-Dec-2024
CMPPending
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
28-Nov-2024
CMPPending
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
21-Nov-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
13-Nov-2024
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
This is a witness affidavit (testimony) in a GST-related case (STC 398 of 2021) before the Criminal Court at Palladam, dated 13.11.2024. A Central GST official testified that E-way Bills are mandatory for goods movement, GST filings can proceed without E-way Bills with subsequent verification, and the Central GST office has no information on the state GST invoices in question—directing inquiries to the State GST office instead. The witness statement was recorded and affirmed under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Nov-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
07-Nov-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
03-Oct-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
29-Aug-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
25-Jun-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
28-May-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
15-May-2024
Await Records
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
30-Apr-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
17-Apr-2024
CMPPending
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
06-Apr-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
27-Mar-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
12-Mar-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
27-Feb-2024
CMPPending
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
20-Feb-2024
CMPPending
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
09-Feb-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
06-Feb-2024
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
28-Nov-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
13-Oct-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
22-Sep-2023
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
-
22-Sep-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
18-Aug-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
28-Jul-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
23-Jun-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
12-May-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
19-Apr-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
28-Mar-2023
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
03-Mar-2023
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
-
03-Mar-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
03-Feb-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
16-Dec-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
04-Nov-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
13-Oct-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
15-Sep-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
25-Aug-2022
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
-
25-Aug-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
11-Aug-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
20-Jul-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
12-Jul-2022
Lok Adalat
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
08-Jul-2022
Lok Adalat
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
03-Jun-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
07-Apr-2022
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
01-Apr-2022
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
12-Mar-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
18-Feb-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
31-Dec-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
11-Dec-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
26-Nov-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
24-Sep-2021
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
04-Aug-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Aug-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 398/2021
This is a witness affidavit (testimony) in a GST-related case (STC 398 of 2021) before the Criminal Court at Palladam, dated 13.11.2024. A Central GST official testified that E-way Bills are mandatory for goods movement, GST filings can proceed without E-way Bills with subsequent verification, and the Central GST office has no information on the state GST invoices in question—directing inquiries to the State GST office instead. The witness statement was recorded and affirmed under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts