VENGATESH vs PALLADAM POLICE STATION — 128/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 392OFIPC. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTI110005062026

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

506/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

128/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 392OFIPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VENGATESH

    Adv. Thirukumaran Thirukumaran

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PALLADAM POLICE STATION

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Judicial Magistrate at Palladam granted bail to Venkatesh, accused under Section 392 IPC (robbery), after he spent 91 days in judicial custody. The court found that considering the prolonged detention, the pending trial status since January 2023, and the accused's assurance of cooperation, bail was justified. The accused was released on Rs. 10,000 bond with conditions including daily police station reporting, production of two sureties, and restrictions against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 128/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate at Palladam granted bail to Venkatesh, accused under Section 392 IPC (robbery), after he spent 91 days in judicial custody. The court found that considering the prolonged detention, the pending trial status since January 2023, and the accused's assurance of cooperation, bail was justified. The accused was released on Rs. 10,000 bond with conditions including daily police station reporting, production of two sureties, and restrictions against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case