Suresh vs Inspector of Police — 122/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4),305(A). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTI110004462026
e-Filing Number
03-03-2026
Filing Number
446/2026
Filing Date
04-Mar-2026
Registration No
122/2026
Registration Date
04-Mar-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
77
Police Station
Palladam Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Suresh
Adv. Arunkumar Suseendran
Respondent(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary: The Palladam Judicial Magistrate allowed the petitioner's petition to recover 28 new and 14 old batteries stolen from his auto electrical business, granting interim custody instead of permanent return. The court found no dispute over ownership and, following Supreme Court guidelines, handed over the property subject to conditions including a Rs. 1,50,000 personal bond, photographs certification, panchanama execution, and an undertaking not to alienate or transfer the property until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
04-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 122/2026
Summary: The Palladam Judicial Magistrate allowed the petitioner's petition to recover 28 new and 14 old batteries stolen from his auto electrical business, granting interim custody instead of permanent return. The court found no dispute over ownership and, following Supreme Court guidelines, handed over the property subject to conditions including a Rs. 1,50,000 personal bond, photographs certification, panchanama execution, and an undertaking not to alienate or transfer the property until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts