RAMESH vs The Inspector of Police Palladam Police Station — 121/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTI110004452026

e-Filing Number

03-03-2026

Filing Number

445/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

121/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

38

Police Station

Palladam Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMESH

    Adv. Jeeva rathinam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of Police Palladam Police Station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate Court of Palladam allowed the petition and ordered the interim release of the seized Splendor+ motorcycle (TN 42 AF 8017) to its owner Ramesh, recognizing his undisputed ownership and relying on Supreme Court guidelines. The release was granted subject to strict conditions including a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000, monthly court production, detailed panchanama, photography documentation, and prohibition on selling or altering the vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 121/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court of Palladam allowed the petition and ordered the interim release of the seized Splendor+ motorcycle (TN 42 AF 8017) to its owner Ramesh, recognizing his undisputed ownership and relying on Supreme Court guidelines. The release was granted subject to strict conditions including a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000, monthly court production, detailed panchanama, photography documentation, and prohibition on selling or altering the vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case