Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Karadivavi Rep by Assistanat Engineer Shanmuga raj vs State through the Inspector of Police Palladam Police Station — 120/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497 503. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTI110004442026
e-Filing Number
03-03-2026
Filing Number
444/2026
Filing Date
03-Mar-2026
Registration No
120/2026
Registration Date
03-Mar-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
10
Police Station
Palladam Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Karadivavi Rep by Assistanat Engineer Shanmuga raj
Adv. S.BALAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.State through the Inspector of Police Palladam Police Station
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate of Palladam allowed the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board's petition to return Rs. 1,35,000 in seized money (proceeds from stolen transformer copper and oil) as interim custody to the petitioner, finding no dispute over ownership. The court imposed conditions including execution of a personal bond of Rs. 10,000, submission of certified photographs, execution of panchanama, and identification by counsel and investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
03-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 120/2026
The Judicial Magistrate of Palladam allowed the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board's petition to return Rs. 1,35,000 in seized money (proceeds from stolen transformer copper and oil) as interim custody to the petitioner, finding no dispute over ownership. The court imposed conditions including execution of a personal bond of Rs. 10,000, submission of certified photographs, execution of panchanama, and identification by counsel and investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts