ANIL vs INSPECTOR OF POLICE — 114/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 275,123. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 23rd March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTI110004382026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

24-02-2026

Filing Number

438/2026

Filing Date

02-03-2026

Registration No

114/2026

Registration Date

02-03-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

FIR Details

FIR Number

1258

Police Station

Palladam Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 275,123
CIGARETTE AND OTHER TOBACCO PRODUCTS ACTS 2003 Section 7(1),20(2)

Petitioner(s)

ANIL

Adv. Amarnath Arumugam

Respondent(s)

INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

23-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Enquiry

11-03-2026

Enquiry

10-03-2026

Enquiry

09-03-2026

Enquiry

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

The Palladam Judicial Magistrate dismissed the petitioner's application for interim custody of his seized Mahindra XUV 500 vehicle (Cr.No.1258/2025, offences under BNS sections 275, 123, and COTPA Act). The court rejected the petition because the investigation is ongoing, the vehicle is material evidence, and the petitioner failed to clarify discrepancies in registration documents, finding risk of evidence tampering and potential recurrence of offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Palladam Judicial Magistrate dismissed the petitioner's application for interim custody of his seized Mahindra XUV 500 vehicle (Cr.No.1258/2025, offences under BNS sections 275, 123, and COTPA Act). The court rejected the petition because the investigation is ongoing, the vehicle is material evidence, and the petitioner failed to clarify discrepancies in registration documents, finding risk of evidence tampering and potential recurrence of offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case