ANIL vs INSPECTOR OF POLICE — 114/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 275,123. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTI110004382026

e-Filing Number

24-02-2026

Filing Number

438/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

114/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1258

Police Station

Palladam Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 275,123
Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Acts 2003 Section 7(1),20(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANIL

    Adv. Amarnath Arumugam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Palladam Judicial Magistrate dismissed the petitioner's application for interim custody of his seized Mahindra XUV 500 vehicle (Cr.No.1258/2025, offences under BNS sections 275, 123, and COTPA Act). The court rejected the petition because the investigation is ongoing, the vehicle is material evidence, and the petitioner failed to clarify discrepancies in registration documents, finding risk of evidence tampering and potential recurrence of offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  8. 04-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  9. 03-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  10. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 114/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Palladam Judicial Magistrate dismissed the petitioner's application for interim custody of his seized Mahindra XUV 500 vehicle (Cr.No.1258/2025, offences under BNS sections 275, 123, and COTPA Act). The court rejected the petition because the investigation is ongoing, the vehicle is material evidence, and the petitioner failed to clarify discrepancies in registration documents, finding risk of evidence tampering and potential recurrence of offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case