Ramasubbu vs Shree Priyanka Knit Fabs Rep By Its Prop Eswaramurth — 243/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138, 143. Status: Questioning. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTI110003612024
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
08-02-2024
Filing Number
361/2024
Filing Date
09-02-2024
Registration No
243/2024
Registration Date
09-02-2024
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramasubbu
Adv. KEERTHIVARMAN P
Respondent(s)
Shree Priyanka Knit Fabs Rep By Its Prop Eswaramurth
Eswaramurthi
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
Questioning
Questioning
Questioning
Framing of Charges
Copies
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 29-01-2026 | Questioning |
| 11-12-2025 | Questioning |
| 07-11-2025 | Framing of Charges |
| 26-09-2025 | Copies |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: STC 243 of 2024, Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam Outcome: This is a witness affidavit (PW 1) recorded on 05.03.2024 under Section 200 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. The witness, Thiru Ramasubbu Jathi (age 49), solemnly affirmed the contents of his written statement as true, with five supporting documents (correspondence and postal acknowledgments from July-November 2023) marked as exhibits. The court noted the affidavit was typed directly and verified by the witness before signing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: STC 243 of 2024, Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam Outcome: This is a witness affidavit (PW 1) recorded on 05.03.2024 under Section 200 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. The witness, Thiru Ramasubbu Jathi (age 49), solemnly affirmed the contents of his written statement as true, with five supporting documents (correspondence and postal acknowledgments from July-November 2023) marked as exhibits. The court noted the affidavit was typed directly and verified by the witness before signing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts