Jayadevi inspector of police palladam Ps vs Prabu and 1 other — 5/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(3),309(4),111(2)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--Committed to Court of Session on 05th March 2026.
PRC - Preliminary Register Case
CNR: TNTI110002352026
e-Filing Number
13-01-2026
Filing Number
235/2026
Filing Date
27-01-2026
Registration No
5/2026
Registration Date
30-01-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
Decision Date
05th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Committed to Court of Session
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jayadevi inspector of police palladam Ps (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
Prabu and 1 other
Hussain Mohamed
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 19-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 05-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 30-01-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary A Judicial Magistrate Court in Palladam, Tamil Nadu ordered the transfer of a dacoity case involving two accused persons (Prabu, 43, and Hussain Muhammad, 43) to the Principal District and Sessions Court in Tiruppur for trial under BNS sections 331(3), 309(4), and 111(2)(b). The accused allegedly committed a daylight robbery on November 29, 2025, stealing gold jewelry worth ₹75,000 and two bangles worth ₹50,000, plus a ring worth ₹5,000 from a woman named Nachammaal, and the accused are repeat offenders with prior criminal records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary A Judicial Magistrate Court in Palladam, Tamil Nadu ordered the transfer of a dacoity case involving two accused persons (Prabu, 43, and Hussain Muhammad, 43) to the Principal District and Sessions Court in Tiruppur for trial under BNS sections 331(3), 309(4), and 111(2)(b). The accused allegedly committed a daylight robbery on November 29, 2025, stealing gold jewelry worth ₹75,000 and two bangles worth ₹50,000, plus a ring worth ₹5,000 from a woman named Nachammaal, and the accused are repeat offenders with prior criminal records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts