Palladam PS vs Karthic and another — 196/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,380. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 26th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTI110002312015
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Date
28-09-2015
Registration No
196/2015
Registration Date
28-09-2015
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
236
Police Station
Palladam Police Station
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Palladam PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Karthic and another
Nagendran
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 25-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 23-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision The Judicial Magistrate Court in Palladam acquitted two accused individuals (Karthick and Nagendhiran) of charges under IPC Sections 457 (burglary) and 380 (theft) related to the theft of 19 batteries from an electrical shop on March 15, 2014. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused were involved in the crime, as the government witnesses could not positively identify the accused at the crime scene or connect them directly to the stolen materials. Consequently, the court ordered their release under Section 248(1) CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Court Decision The Judicial Magistrate Court in Palladam acquitted two accused individuals (Karthick and Nagendhiran) of charges under IPC Sections 457 (burglary) and 380 (theft) related to the theft of 19 batteries from an electrical shop on March 15, 2014. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused were involved in the crime, as the government witnesses could not positively identify the accused at the crime scene or connect them directly to the stolen materials. Consequently, the court ordered their release under Section 248(1) CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts