Palladam PS vs Karthic and another — 197/2015

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,380. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTI110002212015

Filing Date

28-Sep-2015

Registration No

197/2015

Registration Date

28-Sep-2015

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

825

Police Station

Palladam Police Station

Year

2014

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 457,380

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Palladam PS (Police Station)

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Karthic and another

  2. 2.Nagendran

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court at Palladam acquitted two accused individuals, Karthick and Nagendhiran, of charges under IPC sections 457 (burglary) and 380 (theft) in a 2014 home burglary case. The court found that while the prosecution presented testimony from the complainant and investigating officer, key inconsistencies in witness statements—particularly contradictions regarding the amount of money stolen—and the absence of credible evidence directly linking the accused to the crime meant the charges were not proven beyond reasonable doubt. The court ruled that the recovery of stolen mobile phones alone was insufficient to establish guilt without corroborating witness testimony and ordered the accused's acquittal under CrPC section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  7. 03-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  10. 17-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  11. 09-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  12. 27-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  13. 20-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  14. 09-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  15. 24-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  16. 12-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  17. 05-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  18. 22-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  19. 29-Sep-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  20. 02-Sep-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  21. 06-Aug-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  22. 22-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  23. 04-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  24. 11-Jun-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  25. 04-Jun-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  26. 05-May-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  27. 11-Mar-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  28. 13-Feb-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  29. 11-Feb-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  30. 10-Jan-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  31. 18-Dec-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  32. 29-Nov-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  33. 21-Oct-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  34. 16-Oct-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  35. 14-Oct-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  36. 30-Sep-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  37. 17-Sep-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  38. 03-Sep-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  39. 01-Aug-2024

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  40. 08-May-2024

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  41. 23-Feb-2024

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  42. 05-Jan-2024

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  43. 02-Dec-2023

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  44. 26-Sep-2023

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  45. 27-Jun-2023

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  46. 29-Mar-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  47. 19-Jan-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  48. 05-Jan-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  49. 22-Dec-2022

    Remand

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  50. 08-Dec-2022

    Remand

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  51. 24-Nov-2022

    Remand

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  52. 11-Nov-2022

    Remand

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  53. 28-Oct-2022

    Remand

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  54. 14-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  55. 30-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  56. 17-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  57. 29-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  58. 18-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  59. 27-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  60. 01-Feb-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  61. 20-Dec-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  62. 13-Dec-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  63. 29-Nov-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  64. 06-Oct-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  65. 22-Jul-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  66. 28-Apr-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  67. 30-Mar-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  68. 16-Mar-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  69. 17-Feb-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  70. 20-Jan-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  71. 04-Jan-2021

    Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF

  72. 04-Jan-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  73. 07-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  74. 09-Nov-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  75. 10-Sep-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  76. 26-Jun-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  77. 13-May-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  78. 24-Apr-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  79. 13-Feb-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  80. 19-Dec-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  81. 02-Nov-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  82. 16-Aug-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  83. 07-Jun-2019

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  84. 12-Apr-2019

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  85. 28-Jan-2019

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  86. 11-Dec-2018

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  87. 10-Oct-2018

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  88. 29-Aug-2018

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  89. 07-Aug-2018

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  90. 13-Jun-2018

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

  91. 11-Apr-2018

    Evidence

    Thiru.G.Krishnan.B.A.,L.L.B.,

  92. 14-Feb-2018

    Evidence

    Thiru.G.Krishnan.B.A.,L.L.B.,

  93. 13-Dec-2017

    Evidence

    Thiru.G.Krishnan.B.A.,L.L.B.,

  94. 11-Oct-2017

    Evidence

    Thiru.G.Krishnan.B.A.,L.L.B.,

  95. 09-Aug-2017

    Issue of Service

    Thiru.G.Krishnan.B.A.,L.L.B.,

  96. 14-Jun-2017

    Issue of Service

    Thiru.G.Krishnan.B.A.,L.L.B.,

  97. 08-Mar-2017

    Issue of Service

    Thiru.G.Krishnan.B.A.,L.L.B.,

  98. 11-Jan-2017

    Issue of Service

    Thiru.G.Krishnan.B.A.,L.L.B.,

  99. 09-Nov-2016

    Evidence

    Thiru.G.Krishnan.B.A.,L.L.B.,

  100. 21-Sep-2016

    Evidence

    Thiru.G.Krishnan.B.A.,L.L.B.,

  101. 20-Jul-2016

    Evidence

    Thiru.G.Krishnan.B.A.,L.L.B.,

  102. 12-Jul-2016

    Evidence

    Thiru.G.Krishnan.B.A.,L.L.B.,

  103. 28-Jun-2016

    Copies

    Thiru.G.Krishnan.B.A.,L.L.B.,

  104. 26-Apr-2016

    Issue of Service

    Thiru.G.Krishnan.B.A.,L.L.B.,

  105. 29-Mar-2016

    Issue of Service

    Thiru.G.Krishnan.B.A.,L.L.B.,

  106. 01-Mar-2016

    Issue of Service

    Thiru.G.Krishnan.B.A.,L.L.B.,

  107. 01-Dec-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  108. 28-Sep-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 197/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court at Palladam acquitted two accused individuals, Karthick and Nagendhiran, of charges under IPC sections 457 (burglary) and 380 (theft) in a 2014 home burglary case. The court found that while the prosecution presented testimony from the complainant and investigating officer, key inconsistencies in witness statements—particularly contradictions regarding the amount of money stolen—and the absence of credible evidence directly linking the accused to the crime meant the charges were not proven beyond reasonable doubt. The court ruled that the recovery of stolen mobile phones alone was insufficient to establish guilt without corroborating witness testimony and ordered the accused's acquittal under CrPC section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case