PONESAKKI vs RAYAPPAN Advocate - Banumathi R — 128/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTI110002152023
Next Hearing
07th May 2026
e-Filing Number
06-02-2023
Filing Number
215/2023
Filing Date
06-02-2023
Registration No
128/2023
Registration Date
06-02-2023
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PONESAKKI
Adv. Dharani s
Respondent(s)
RAYAPPAN Advocate - Banumathi R
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 05-02-2026 | Part Heard |
| 11-12-2025 | Part Heard |
| 07-11-2025 | Part Heard |
| 19-09-2025 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This is a Negotiable Instruments Act (NI Act) Section 138 cheque bounce case from Palladam Magistrate Court (Case STC 128 of 2023). The court recorded the sworn statement of the complainant (PW1), a 35-year-old woman, who testified about a cheque for Rs. 1 lakh issued by the defendant on 25.08.2022 from Indian Overseas Bank that was dishonored. The complainant's testimony and supporting documentary evidence (cheque, return memo, legal notices, and postal acknowledgments) were admitted into the record as exhibits. The document appears to be the examination-in-chief of the first witness; no final order on the case outcome is provided in this record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Negotiable Instruments Act (NI Act) Section 138 cheque bounce case from Palladam Magistrate Court (Case STC 128 of 2023). The court recorded the sworn statement of the complainant (PW1), a 35-year-old woman, who testified about a cheque for Rs. 1 lakh issued by the defendant on 25.08.2022 from Indian Overseas Bank that was dishonored. The complainant's testimony and supporting documentary evidence (cheque, return memo, legal notices, and postal acknowledgments) were admitted into the record as exhibits. The document appears to be the examination-in-chief of the first witness; no final order on the case outcome is provided in this record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts