PONESAKKI vs RAYAPPAN Advocate - Banumathi R — 128/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTI110002152023
e-Filing Number
06-02-2023
Filing Number
215/2023
Filing Date
06-Feb-2023
Registration No
128/2023
Registration Date
06-Feb-2023
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PONESAKKI
Adv. Dharani s
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAYAPPAN Advocate - Banumathi R
Case History
-
07-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
05-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
11-Dec-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
07-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
19-Sep-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
31-Jul-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
23-May-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
24-Apr-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
06-Feb-2025
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
22-Nov-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
25-Oct-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
18-Oct-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
26-Jul-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
21-Jun-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
04-Jun-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
21-May-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
30-Apr-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
10-Apr-2024
CMPPending
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
20-Mar-2024
CMPPending
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
12-Mar-2024
CMPPending
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
20-Feb-2024
CMPPending
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
14-Feb-2024
CMPPending
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
30-Jan-2024
CMPPending
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
06-Jan-2024
CMPPending
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
19-Dec-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
03-Nov-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
01-Sep-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
21-Jul-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
09-Jun-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
19-May-2023
Trial
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
21-Apr-2023
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
06-Apr-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
06-Mar-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam
-
06-Feb-2023
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
This is a Negotiable Instruments Act (NI Act) Section 138 cheque bounce case from Palladam Magistrate Court (Case STC 128 of 2023). The court recorded the sworn statement of the complainant (PW1), a 35-year-old woman, who testified about a cheque for Rs. 1 lakh issued by the defendant on 25.08.2022 from Indian Overseas Bank that was dishonored. The complainant's testimony and supporting documentary evidence (cheque, return memo, legal notices, and postal acknowledgments) were admitted into the record as exhibits. The document appears to be the examination-in-chief of the first witness; no final order on the case outcome is provided in this record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 128/2023
This is a Negotiable Instruments Act (NI Act) Section 138 cheque bounce case from Palladam Magistrate Court (Case STC 128 of 2023). The court recorded the sworn statement of the complainant (PW1), a 35-year-old woman, who testified about a cheque for Rs. 1 lakh issued by the defendant on 25.08.2022 from Indian Overseas Bank that was dishonored. The complainant's testimony and supporting documentary evidence (cheque, return memo, legal notices, and postal acknowledgments) were admitted into the record as exhibits. The document appears to be the examination-in-chief of the first witness; no final order on the case outcome is provided in this record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts