Palladam PS vs Karthic and another — 200064/2016

Case under --- Section 457,380IPC. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 26th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTI110000822016

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Date

01-03-2016

Registration No

200064/2016

Registration Date

01-03-2016

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

Decision Date

26th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Acts & Sections

--- Section 457,380IPC
MP/1/2025 Classification : Advance petition Section Karthic and anotherPalladam PS
MP/2/2025 Classification : Others Section Karthic and anotherPalladam PS
MP/3/2025 Classification : Recall Petition Section Karthic and anotherPalladam PS

Petitioner(s)

Palladam PS (Police Station)

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Karthic and another

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam

26-03-2026

Disposed

23-03-2026

Judgement

09-03-2026

Arguments

03-03-2026

Arguments

25-02-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

26-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Palladam acquitted two accused, Karthick and Nagendhiran, of charges under IPC Sections 457 (lurking house-trespass), 380 (theft), and 511 (attempt), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that while government witnesses testified regarding an attempted theft of a motorcycle, inconsistencies in their accounts and contradictory evidence regarding the motorcycle's location rendered the case insufficient to establish guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Palladam acquitted two accused, Karthick and Nagendhiran, of charges under IPC Sections 457 (lurking house-trespass), 380 (theft), and 511 (attempt), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that while government witnesses testified regarding an attempted theft of a motorcycle, inconsistencies in their accounts and contradictory evidence regarding the motorcycle's location rendered the case insufficient to establish guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palladam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case