Palanisamy vs Ramasamy Advocate - Eswaramoorthy P — 181/2015
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 25(d). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI100001912015
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Date
27-11-2015
Registration No
181/2015
Registration Date
27-11-2015
Court
District Munsif Court, Palladam
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Palanisamy
Adv. Raveendran V
Respondent(s)
Ramasamy Advocate - Eswaramoorthy P
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Trial
Additional Issues
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 01-04-2026 | Trial | |
| 17-03-2026 | Additional Issues | |
| 09-03-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 27-02-2026 | For further Proceedings |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The petition filed by the defendants seeking permission to file an additional written statement was allowed. The District Munsif, Palladam granted the petitioners the right to file supplementary pleadings regarding whether the respondent has an alternative cart track through survey numbers 204 and 206 to access his properties, finding this necessary for fair adjudication since the trial stage has not yet commenced. However, the court imposed a condition requiring the petitioners to pay Rs. 3,000 as cost to the respondent/plaintiff on or before February 26, 2026, failing which the petition would stand dismissed automatically. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The petition filed by the defendants seeking permission to file an additional written statement was allowed. The District Munsif, Palladam granted the petitioners the right to file supplementary pleadings regarding whether the respondent has an alternative cart track through survey numbers 204 and 206 to access his properties, finding this necessary for fair adjudication since the trial stage has not yet commenced. However, the court imposed a condition requiring the petitioners to pay Rs. 3,000 as cost to the respondent/plaintiff on or before February 26, 2026, failing which the petition would stand dismissed automatically. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts