M.Mariyammal vs Deivasigamani and another Advocate - Subramaniam CP — 98/2014
Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 27(c)25(d). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI100001832014
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
Filing Date
17-07-2014
Registration No
98/2014
Registration Date
17-07-2014
Court
District Munsif Court, Palladam
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.Mariyammal
Adv. Sureshkumar P P
Respondent(s)
Deivasigamani and another Advocate - Subramaniam CP
N.Karuppasamy(Died)
Jeevanantham
K.Ananthi
Rajkumar
Nachammal
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Orders
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 04-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 18-02-2026 | Orders |
| 17-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 12-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary The District Munsif Court, Palladam allowed the petition (IA.No.11/2026) filed by M. Mariyammal seeking to receive documents with condonation of delay under Order 7 Rule 14(3) and Section 151 CPC. The court held the documents relevant to the suit and found that receiving them would not prejudice respondents, permitting the petitioner an opportunity to present her case in the interest of justice. The petitioner was ordered to pay Rs. 1,000 as costs to the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The District Munsif Court, Palladam allowed the petition (IA.No.11/2026) filed by M. Mariyammal seeking to receive documents with condonation of delay under Order 7 Rule 14(3) and Section 151 CPC. The court held the documents relevant to the suit and found that receiving them would not prejudice respondents, permitting the petitioner an opportunity to present her case in the interest of justice. The petitioner was ordered to pay Rs. 1,000 as costs to the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts