Deivathal Power of Attorney P.natarajan vs S.Shanmugam Advocate - GopalaKrishanan K — 113/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(d),27(c). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.

Trial Next hearing 18-Mar-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI100001472022

Filing Number

145/2022

Filing Date

18-Sep-2022

Registration No

113/2022

Registration Date

18-Sep-2022

Court

District Munsif Court, Palladam

Judge

1-District Munsif

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(d),27(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Deivathal Power of Attorney P.natarajan

    Adv. Manavalan A

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.S.Shanmugam Advocate - GopalaKrishanan K

  2. 2.Palanathal

  3. 3.Sundarambal

  4. 4.Sumathy

  5. 5.Viveka

  6. 6.Nithin

  7. 7.The Sub Registrar Palladam

  8. 8.The District Collector Tiruppur

Case History

  1. 18-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif

  3. 09-Feb-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif

  4. 09-Jan-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif

  5. 10-Dec-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  6. 10-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  7. 01-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  8. 07-Oct-2025

    Await Reports

    District Munsif

  9. 03-Sep-2025

    Mediation

    District Munsif

  10. 15-Jul-2025

    Mediation

    District Munsif

  11. 16-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  12. 23-Apr-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  13. 27-Mar-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  14. 28-Feb-2025

    Copy of Judicial/Revenue proceedings.View PDF

    Case Summary Case: O.S.NO. 113/2022 | District Munsif Court, Palladam | February 28, 2025 Outcome: The court framed five issues for trial in this property dispute. The plaintiff (Deivathal) seeks declaration that a 1993 sale deed is null and void regarding Item 2 of the suit property, along with permanent injunction against defendants 1-6. Defendants 1-6 are marked as *ex parte*. The case proceeds to substantive hearing on the framed issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  15. 28-Feb-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  16. 12-Feb-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  17. 04-Jan-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  18. 26-Nov-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif

  19. 28-Oct-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif

  20. 17-Sep-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif

  21. 07-Aug-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif

  22. 09-Jul-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  23. 16-Apr-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  24. 06-Mar-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  25. 16-Nov-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  26. 19-Sep-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  27. 26-Aug-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  28. 03-Aug-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  29. 28-Jul-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  30. 03-Jul-2023

    Steps

    District Munsif

  31. 02-Jun-2023

    Steps

    District Munsif

  32. 06-Apr-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  33. 15-Mar-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  34. 14-Feb-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  35. 06-Jan-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  36. 20-Oct-2022

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  37. 22-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 18-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 113/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: O.S.NO. 113/2022 | District Munsif Court, Palladam | February 28, 2025 Outcome: The court framed five issues for trial in this property dispute. The plaintiff (Deivathal) seeks declaration that a 1993 sale deed is null and void regarding Item 2 of the suit property, along with permanent injunction against defendants 1-6. Defendants 1-6 are marked as *ex parte*. The case proceeds to substantive hearing on the framed issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case