Suresh.S vs The District Registrar, Administration — 106/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.

IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending Next hearing 12-Mar-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI100001472021

Filing Number

210/2021

Filing Date

23-Sep-2021

Registration No

106/2021

Registration Date

08-Oct-2021

Court

District Munsif Court, Palladam

Judge

1-District Munsif

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Suresh.S

    Adv. Giri N V

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The District Registrar, Administration

  2. 2.Sub-Registrar palladam

Case History

  1. 12-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  3. 17-Feb-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  4. 07-Feb-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  6. 09-Jan-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif

  7. 15-Dec-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  8. 25-Nov-2025

    Restored

    District Munsif

  9. 25-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  10. 25-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  11. 13-Nov-2025

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The District Munsif Court, Palladam allowed the petition to restore OS No.106/2021, which had been dismissed for default on 28.08.2024. The petitioner's failure to appear for trial was attributed to an advocate's boycott on that date, and the court found this to be a sufficient reason in the interest of justice. The restoration is granted conditionally upon payment of Rs. 1,000 to the District Legal Services Authority by 24.11.2025, failing which the petition stands automatically dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 28-Aug-2024

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  13. 28-Aug-2024

    Disposed

    District Munsif

  14. 26-Jul-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif

  15. 19-Jun-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif

  16. 20-Mar-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif

  17. 15-Feb-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif

  18. 05-Dec-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  19. 02-Nov-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  20. 14-Sep-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  21. 16-Aug-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  22. 24-Jul-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  23. 23-Jun-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  24. 25-Apr-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  25. 19-Apr-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  26. 28-Mar-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  27. 01-Mar-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  28. 09-Feb-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  29. 18-Nov-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  30. 23-Sep-2022

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  31. 08-Jul-2022

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  32. 07-Jun-2022

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  33. 18-Mar-2022

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  34. 17-Mar-2022

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  35. 24-Feb-2022

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  36. 06-Jan-2022

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  37. 16-Dec-2021

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  38. 18-Nov-2021

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  39. 09-Nov-2021

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  40. 08-Oct-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  41. 23-Sep-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 106/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Munsif Court, Palladam allowed the petition to restore OS No.106/2021, which had been dismissed for default on 28.08.2024. The petitioner's failure to appear for trial was attributed to an advocate's boycott on that date, and the court found this to be a sufficient reason in the interest of justice. The restoration is granted conditionally upon payment of Rs. 1,000 to the District Legal Services Authority by 24.11.2025, failing which the petition stands automatically dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case