Kandasamy vs P.R.Manickam — 84/2019
Case under Suitsvaluationact Section 27(c). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI100001172019
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
166/2019
Filing Date
14-08-2019
Registration No
84/2019
Registration Date
14-08-2019
Court
District Munsif Court, Palladam
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kandasamy
Adv. Sakthivel P
Respondent(s)
P.R.Manickam
P.R.Muthaiya
R.M. Kalayanasundaram
R.M.Ramanathan
P.R.Rajendran
P.L.Kalyani
T.Thangaraj
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 02-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 18-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 09-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 25-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition for temporary injunction is dismissed. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case or balance of convenience in his favor. The competent revenue authorities (Tahsildar and Special Deputy Collector) had already rejected the petitioner's claim to cultivating tenant status in orders dated 15.12.2022 and 08.08.2023, finding he was a government servant with no physical involvement in cultivation. The interim injunction order previously granted is hereby vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition for temporary injunction is dismissed. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case or balance of convenience in his favor. The competent revenue authorities (Tahsildar and Special Deputy Collector) had already rejected the petitioner's claim to cultivating tenant status in orders dated 15.12.2022 and 08.08.2023, finding he was a government servant with no physical involvement in cultivation. The interim injunction order previously granted is hereby vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts