R.Murugesan vs R.Ranganathan — 85/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section o 7 r 1. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat on 14th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI100001122025
Filing Number
170/2025
Filing Date
13-Aug-2025
Registration No
85/2025
Registration Date
13-Aug-2025
Court
District Munsif Court, Palladam
Judge
1-District Munsif
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.R.Murugesan
Adv. Rajesh A
Respondent(s)
-
1.R.Ranganathan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The National Lok Adalat at Palladam District Court settled a dispute between Mr. R. Murugesan (plaintiff) and Mr. R. Ranganathan (defendant) through mutual negotiation and mediation. Both parties agreed to settle the matter for Rs. 40,000, with the defendant required to pay within three months; if payment fails, the plaintiff may file an execution petition. The case was closed as per the settlement agreement, with court fees to be refunded as per the Court Fees Act 1870 and Legal Services Authorities Act 1987. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Munsif
-
09-Mar-2026
Lok Adalat
District Munsif
-
24-Feb-2026
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
06-Feb-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
03-Feb-2026
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
-
03-Feb-2026
Copy of Deposition / WitnessView PDF
-
03-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Munsif
-
05-Jan-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
06-Dec-2025
Appearance
District Munsif
-
25-Nov-2025
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
07-Oct-2025
Issue of Service
District Munsif
-
13-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 85/2025
The National Lok Adalat at Palladam District Court settled a dispute between Mr. R. Murugesan (plaintiff) and Mr. R. Ranganathan (defendant) through mutual negotiation and mediation. Both parties agreed to settle the matter for Rs. 40,000, with the defendant required to pay within three months; if payment fails, the plaintiff may file an execution petition. The case was closed as per the settlement agreement, with court fees to be refunded as per the Court Fees Act 1870 and Legal Services Authorities Act 1987. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts