N.Sakthivel vs Marappa gounder and 5 others — 100113/2008
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 37(2). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNTI100000962008
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
Filing Number
100113/2008
Filing Date
21-04-2008
Registration No
100113/2008
Registration Date
21-04-2008
Court
District Munsif Court, Palladam
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
N.Sakthivel
Adv. Sureshkumar P P
Respondent(s)
Marappa gounder and 5 others
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Written Statement
Written Statement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 05-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 02-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 27-02-2026 | Written Statement |
| 19-02-2026 | Written Statement |
Interim Orders
This is a witness examination record (not a final court order) from the District Civil Court, Palladam (Case No. 113/2008) dated January 19, 2026. The 13th defendant, A.K. Ramasamy, filed additional examination-in-chief testimony and submitted a certified copy of the final judgment from Case No. 50/2011 as evidence. Cross-examination by the plaintiff's counsel was adjourned, and the witness testimony was recorded and signed by the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a witness examination record (not a final court order) from the District Civil Court, Palladam (Case No. 113/2008) dated January 19, 2026. The 13th defendant, A.K. Ramasamy, filed additional examination-in-chief testimony and submitted a certified copy of the final judgment from Case No. 50/2011 as evidence. Cross-examination by the plaintiff's counsel was adjourned, and the witness testimony was recorded and signed by the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts