Kaliammal vs M.Natarajan — 100107/2013
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 25(b). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNTI100000852013
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
100107/2013
Filing Date
04-07-2013
Registration No
100107/2013
Registration Date
04-07-2013
Court
District Munsif Court, Palladam
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kaliammal
Adv. Rajan D S
Respondent(s)
M.Natarajan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 07-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 01-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a cross-examination (witness examination) record from a civil suit (Case No. 107/2013) in the District Civil Court, Palladam dated 16.03.2026. The court examined witness Palaniswamy's testimony regarding a property dispute involving land (Survey No. 89/2) allegedly purchased by Marappa Koundar. The judge found the witness's testimony unreliable and contradictory, noting he made inconsistent statements about events from 30 years prior and could not identify key parties. The court rejected the witness's credibility, concluding his testimony should be disregarded and cannot form the basis for any judgment in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a cross-examination (witness examination) record from a civil suit (Case No. 107/2013) in the District Civil Court, Palladam dated 16.03.2026. The court examined witness Palaniswamy's testimony regarding a property dispute involving land (Survey No. 89/2) allegedly purchased by Marappa Koundar. The judge found the witness's testimony unreliable and contradictory, noting he made inconsistent statements about events from 30 years prior and could not identify key parties. The court rejected the witness's credibility, concluding his testimony should be disregarded and cannot form the basis for any judgment in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts